As a freshman entering Brown University, I was convinced that I wanted to be an entrepreneur. One of the most significant reasons for choosing Brown was their open curriculum; this approach allows students to choose their own path rather than be forced to...
As a freshman entering Brown University, I was convinced that I wanted to be an entrepreneur. One of the most significant reasons for choosing Brown was their open curriculum; this approach allows students to choose their own path rather than be forced to take requirements that may not be relevant nor enjoyable. Similarly, I was enamored with the idea of starting my own company and controlling my own destiny rather than becoming a cog in a rigid machine. I must admit that I was also driven by the glamorous idea of quickly making millions. Thus, I decided that I would complete the Entrepreneurship and Technology track of BEO (Business, Entrepreneurship, and Organizations) to gain the necessary knowledge to start a company before I left Brown.
In my first semester I attempted to take Danny Warshay’s course, The Entrepreneurial Process: Innovation in Practice. To my disappointment, I learned that I could not take the course as a freshman and was unable to take it until my junior fall. Though I took several other courses related to business and entrepreneurship in the interim, when I was finally able to take Danny’s course it proved the most useful by far; it taught me what it means to be an entrepreneur. A significant element of the class is a semester-long team project to create a business plan and give a final pitch to VCs. I learned that this process is not as glamorous as I had imagined and that I had a long, long way to go before I’d feel prepared to start my own company.
More important than the material I’ve learned from him, Danny has also been an incredible mentor to me and pushed me to better understand myself. Though I had not yet heard of VFA, he echoed many of the same values during a lecture that’s come to be known as “The Rant.” To begin The Rant, Danny draws a line that divides into two paths on the board, one he labels McKinsey and the other Goldman Sachs. As silly as it might seem, he explains that many Brown students over the years have seen these as being their only options (or some other big company in consulting or on Wall Street). This is somewhat unsurprising given that such companies are quite prestigious, offer high starting salaries, and recruit heavily on campus. However, Danny’s most important point during The Rant is that we should take the time to understand ourselves and our passions, because he has seen too many students who follow the aforementioned paths only to find unhappiness.
I took his advice to heart and realized that perhaps I wanted to be an entrepreneur for the wrong reasons. So I asked myself, what do I actually want to do? I quickly found that this is no easy question to address, but after much thought and several conversations with Brown alumni I felt that I had arrived at an answer: I love games, both playing them and creating them. My entire life I’ve played sports, video games, boardgames, and every other kind of game imaginable while developing several of my own along the way. As such, in the summer before my final year at Brown, I explored this passion by working at a board game café and developing a board game with my brother on the side.
That summer brought another important realization, I love games but I don’t want game development to be my life’s work. Certainly a hobby, but I didn’t feel that it would fully engage my varied strengths and interests. Now back at square one, I began searching for other options. Yet again, Danny Warshay came to my rescue when, now as his teaching assistant, he asked me to pass along an opportunity to the class. That opportunity was VFA.
I’d never heard of VFA, but as soon as I looked into it I knew that it was perfect for me. An information session on campus and a chat with Victor Bartash only cemented my conviction.
A few days before the process began I admitted to my Mom that I was worried. I was worried that I wouldn’t find the perfect company, that I would have to compromise on one of the criteria I’d set in my mind. In typical Mom fashion, she told me that she had every confidence that I would find somewhere that would be great for me.
As it turns out, her confidence was well placed and I was fortunate to find the perfect opportunity at Leverege. To this day I still cannot believe how perfect it is, every condition that I sought was met. I attribute much of it to luck, but I also believe that there were several things that Leverege and I did right during the process.
The first thing that Leverege did right was in naming their opportunity “CEO in Training.” This title immediately leapt out to me since it appealed to my desire to one day start my own company and was so different from the opportunities posted by other organizations. In general, I’d advise companies to put some thought into the names of the opportunities they post on VFA Match as I found that many tended towards generic.
Due in part to the uniqueness of the name and my own proactivity, the first thing that I did right was to immediately reach out to Leverege. In fact, I’m told that I was the first to do so which led to me also being the first to speak with them over the phone. This proved to be a huge advantage as I immediately set the bar for all the fellows that followed. As such, my recommendation to future fellows is to be as proactive as possible and to begin reaching out to companies as soon as the match process opens up. Although this may seem daunting during the middle of one’s senior spring, this ended up saving me several weeks of work as I was able to accept an offer early in the process.
Despite how well the first conversation went, Leverege and I were both right to continue to explore other options. On my end, my talks with other companies only reinforced my conviction that Leverege was the perfect opportunity for me. For example, the representative of one particular company who I spoke to seemed bored, disinterested, and unprepared which strongly juxtaposed the energy and preparedness of Leverege. Though I can’t speak for Leverege, I imagine that their conversations with other fellows helped them to be confident in their decision to extend an offer to me. My general recommendation to fellows is to speak with as many companies as possible because it will help in identifying one’s values and what one finds important in a company.
Finally, another thing that Leverege did right was to be extremely transparent during the interview process. I found this very refreshing, and it encouraged me to be transparent in return. I told Leverege that they were easily my number one company, and that I would accept an offer immediately if they were to extend one to me. By being transparent, companies can help to alleviate some of the stress inherent in the match process, whether the feedback is good or bad. If it’s good, this alleviates the stress of worrying that one performed poorly during the interviews. If it’s bad, this allows the fellow to either take steps to address the concerns or to devote energy to matching with another company instead.
In retrospect, the match process seems almost like a fairy tale. Had I described the perfect company before the process began, that company would be Leverege.
I know that my situation was somewhat unique, but from my conversations with other fellows I’ve found that the vast majority feel similarly that they’ve found incredible opportunities at their respective companies. I’m ecstatic to be a part of VFA and can’t wait for what’s to come these next few years.