Where will IoT Take You?
Join companies like Cox Communications, Comcast, and Google to unlock powerful insights through digital transformation.
When it comes to connecting the Internet of Things, there are an overwhelming number of options.
When it comes to connecting the Internet of Things, there are an overwhelming number of options. Cellular, satellite, WiFi, Bluetooth, RFID, NFC, LPWAN, and Ethernet are all possible ways to connect a sensor/device. And within each of these options there can be different providers (e.g. for cellular there’s T-Mobile, Verizon, AT&T, Sprint, etc.).
If you’re simply interested in IoT and how it works, it’s nearly impossible to sift through dense articles like this and this to get a basic understanding (and if you don't know how an IoT system actually works, start here).
To help bring clarity to my fellow non-technical people, here’s everything important to know about connecting the Internet of Things that I’ve learned working at Leverege:
The perfect connectivity option would consume extremely little power, have huge range, and would be able to transmit large amounts of data (high bandwidth). Unfortunately, this perfect connectivity doesn’t exist.
Each connectivity option represents a tradeoff between power consumption, range, and bandwidth. This allows us to segment the various connectivity options into three major groups:
To wirelessly send a lot of data over a great distance, it takes a lot of power. A great example of this is your smartphone. Your phone can receive and transmit large amounts of data (e.g. video) over great distances, but you need to charge it every 1–2 days.
Connectivity options in this group include cellular and satellite.
Cellular is used when the sensor/device is within coverage of cell towers. For sensors/devices that are, say, in the middle of the ocean, satellite becomes necessary.
To decrease power consumption and still send a lot of data, you have to decrease the range.
Connectivity options in this group include WiFi, Bluetooth, and Ethernet.
Ethernet is a hard-wired connection, so the range is short because it’s only as far as the wire length. WiFi and Bluetooth are both wireless connections with high bandwidth and lower power consumption than cellular and satellite. However, as I’m sure you’ve experienced just walking around your home, the range is limited.
To increase range while maintaining low power consumption, you have to decrease the amount of data that you’re sending.
Connectivity options in this group are called Low-Power Wide-Area Networks (LPWAN) or LoRaWAN.
LPWANs send small amounts of data which allows them to operate at very low power with ranges in miles rather than feet. For example, a moisture sensor for agricultural purposes doesn’t need to send a lot of data, perhaps just a single number (the moisture level) every few hours. You also don’t want this sensor to consume a lot of power because it needs to run on battery (plugging it into an outlet in the middle of a field just isn’t realistic). And since agriculture covers a wide area, WiFi and Bluetooth lack the range.
LPWANs are extremely useful for many IoT applications. They allow tons of sensors to collect and send data over broad areas while lasting years on battery life. Although they can’t send much data, most sensors don’t need to However, these kinds of application often need IoT gateways to work. You can find out more about gateways here.
In the interest of keeping this post simple and high-level, I’ve glossed over some other connectivity options like Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) and Near-Field Communication (NFC).
The groupings above are somewhat generalized, within each there are many diverse options with differing pros and cons.
However, this grouping is a helpful way to conceptualize connecting the Internet of Things and why there are so many options. It all comes down to a tradeoff between power consumption, range, and bandwidth.