Computer Vision Basics: Confidence & Accuracy

When deploying computer vision models in real-world applications—whether for manufacturing defect detection, self-driving cars, or medical imaging—it is crucial to understand three key factors that impact their effectiveness: confidence, accuracy, and decision thresholds.

• Confidence reflects how certain a model is about its predictions.
• Accuracy measures how often the model makes correct predictions.
• Decision thresholds control when a model’s output should be considered valid, influencing the trade-off between false positives and false negatives.

Understanding these concepts is crucial to ensuring that computer vision models function reliably in practical settings. This article explores each of these factors in depth, highlighting their impact on real-world applications and model performance.

Understanding Confidence Scores in Computer Vision Models

Confidence in computer vision models refers to how certain the model is about its predictions. It is typically expressed as a value between 0 and 1. For example, a model might predict that an image contains a cat with a confidence of 0.95.

• High confidence values indicate that the model is more certain about its prediction. However, high confidence doesn't always mean high accuracy. A model might express high confidence in an inaccurate prediction, or low confidence in an accurate one.
• Machine Learning vs. Human Confidence: Unlike human confidence, which incorporates contextual knowledge and experience, machine learning models determine confidence solely based on the input data and trained parameters.

Model Outputs vs. Real-World Decision Making

While computer vision models output confidence scores, real-world applications often require binary decisions (e.g., yes/no). To bridge this gap, confidence thresholds are commonly used.

Example 1: Defect Detection in Manufacturing

A quality inspection model in a factory might predict a defect in a product with a confidence score of 0.82. If the threshold for flagging defects is set at 0.80, the product will be sent for manual inspection.

Example 2: Service Bay Intelligence for Tire Service Centers

A model analyzing video footage in an automotive service bay predicts tire tread wear with 0.76 confidence. If the threshold is set at 0.75, the system generates a recommendation for tire replacement.

Example 3: Queue Optimization for QSRs

A queue monitoring model in a fast-food drive-thru predicts that a vehicle is in line with a confidence score of 0.88. If the threshold is set at 0.85, the system updates estimated wait times and alerts staff to prepare for potential bottlenecks.

This thresholding mechanism ensures that models make practical decisions while balancing errors and usability.

Understanding Accuracy in Computer Vision

Accuracy is a fundamental metric in computer vision that measures the overall correctness of the model’s predictions across all categories. For example, if a model correctly predicts 95 out of 100 instances, it is 95% accurate.

Understanding Predictions

Every model makes both correct and incorrect predictions. Let's take the predicition results of an object detection model that detects frog as an example.

• True Positives (TP): Correctly identifying a frog when a frog is present.
• True Negatives (TN): Correctly identifying that a non-frog is not a frog.
• False Positives (FP): Incorrectly classifying a non-frog as a frog.
• False Negatives (FN): Failing to detect a frog when one is present.

These categories help in evaluating and tuning models to reduce errors and improve performance.

Example: Queue Analytics for Drive-Thru Optimization

In a fast-food restaurant using computer vision for drive-thru optimization, accurate vehicle detection is crucial for managing lane congestion. If a vehicle in the drive-thru is misclassified as being in the parking lot (false negative), staff may not be alerted to a growing queue, potentially leading to longer wait times and customer dissatisfaction. Conversely, if a parked car is mistakenly classified as being in the queue (false positive), the system could incorrectly adjust estimated wait times, leading to unnecessary operational changes. Balancing detection accuracy is essential to ensure reliable queue analytics and efficient service.

Confidence Thresholds and Their Impact

Consider an object detection model designed to detect frogs. If we set a confidence threshold at 0.70:

• Predictions ≥ 0.70 → Classified as a frog.
• Predictions < 0.70 → Discarded as uncertain.

This threshold helps control which predictions are considered valid detections, but the choice of this threshold impacts the model's effectiveness.

Confidence Threshold Trade-offs

A low threshold (e.g., >0.50) results in more detections but also increases the number of false positives, capturing a broader range of potential instances at the cost of accuracy. A balanced threshold (e.g., >0.70) strikes a middle ground, reducing false positives while still detecting most instances, though some false negatives may occur. A high threshold (e.g., >0.90) minimizes false positives by only confirming the most confident detections, but this comes at the risk of missing some valid instances due to stricter criteria.

Choosing the right confidence threshold depends on the application.

Example: Manufacturing Defect Detection

Minimizing false negatives ensures all potential defects are reviewed. Missing a legitimate defect is worse than manually reviewing something that turns out to not be a defect, so minimizing false negatives is more important than minimizing false positives.

Advanced Decision-Making Beyond Confidence Thresholds

While confidence thresholds provide a simple and effective way to make decisions, some applications require more advanced logic. For instance:

• Multi-Step Validation: In manufacturing defect detection, if a defect is detected near a high-stress area of the product, additional photos at new zoom levels might be captured for model analysis.
• Temporal Analysis: In queue analysis, instead of relying on a single frame, the system might analyze multiple frames over time to confirm a vehicle’s position before adjusting estimated wait times.
• Combining Multiple Model Outputs: In service bay intelligence, a vehicle detection model might be combined with vehicle make & model classification model and license plate OCR model to identify the customer’s account.

The Accuracy Metric and It’s Limitations

While accuracy is a useful metric, it has notable limitations, particularly when dealing with imbalanced datasets.

Example: Defect Detection in Manufacturing

If 95% of manufactured components have no defects and only 5% contain defects, a model that always predicts "no defect" will have 95% accuracy but completely fail at identifying actual defective components, leading to undetected quality issues.

To address these issues, additional metrics are often used:

• Precision: Measures how many detected frogs are actually frogs (fewer false positives).
• Recall: Measures how many actual frogs were detected (fewer false negatives).
• F1-Score: A balanced measure between precision and recall.
• Mean Average Precision (mAP): A key metric for object detection models, combining precision and recall across multiple categories.

Conclusion

Computer vision is a powerful field with applications ranging from automated quality inspection to self-driving cars. However, ensuring that models are accurate and reliable requires careful consideration of confidence and accuracy.

Key Takeaways

• Confidence scores indicate model certainty but require thresholds to make real-world decisions.
• Accuracy is a fundamental metric, but additional evaluations like precision and recall are often needed.
• Choosing the right threshold depends on balancing false positives and false negatives based on the specific application.

As computer vision continues to evolve, understanding these principles will be essential for building trustworthy AI systems that function effectively across diverse applications and environments.

‍